A Methodological Study of Forced-Choice Performance Rating

This report has yet to be scanned by Contrails staff

Report Number: HRRC RB 51-9
Author(s): Highland, Richard W., Berkshire, James R.
Corporate Author(s): Human Resources Research Center
Laboratory: Technical Training Research Laboratory
Date of Publication: 1951-05
Pages: 50
Corporate Report Number: Laboratory Research - No Contract
DoD Project: 21-03-027
Identifier: ADA049826

Abstract:
The objective of the present study was a relative evaluation of six different kinds of forced-choice performance rating forms with respect to validity, reliability, biasabilitty, and the degree to which raters liked different forms. The kinks of forced-choice forms used in the investigation varied as to the content of the blocks of statements and as to the directions which were given the raters. Of the forms used in this experiment, those in which the blocks were composed of four favorable-appearing statements, from which the rater was to choose either the two most descriptive, or the most and the least descriptive, were generally superior. The inclusion of both favorable and unfavorable statements in the same block appears to be an inferior method of constructing forced-choice forms.

Provenance: IIT

Other options for obtaining this report:

Via the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC):
A record for this report, and possibly a full-image download of the report, exists at DTIC

Via National Technical Report Library:
This report may be available for download from NTRL. Use the Title from this record to locate the item in DTIC Online

Indications of Public Availability
No digital image of an index entry indicating public availability is currently available
There has been no verification of an indication of public availability from an inside cover statement