A Review Of Literature On The Relative Efficiency Of The Dominant And The Nondominant Eye
This citation is provided as a resource for researchers, but Contrails cannot provide a full-text download
U.S. government employees, Military/Department of Defense employees, and U.S. government contractors and sub-contractors may be eligible to register with the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC), where this report and others like it may be available
Report Number: WADC TR 52-13
Author(s): Gilinsky, A. S.
Corporate Author(s): Columbia Univ New York
Date of Publication: 1952-01
Pages: 25
DoD Task:
Identifier: AD0003567
AD Number: 3567
Abstract:
Evidence on the incidence of ocular dominance is summarized and the findings relevant to the comparative efficiency of the dominant and the non-dominant eye in various perceptual-motor skills and visual functions are reviewed. Although a small advantage for the dominant eye in cases of unmixed manual-ocular laterality is indicated by some studies, there is reason to doubt the permanence and universality of this superiority. No advantage for either eye is found in cases of mixed laterality for any function.
Author(s): Gilinsky, A. S.
Corporate Author(s): Columbia Univ New York
Date of Publication: 1952-01
Pages: 25
DoD Task:
Identifier: AD0003567
AD Number: 3567
Abstract:
Evidence on the incidence of ocular dominance is summarized and the findings relevant to the comparative efficiency of the dominant and the non-dominant eye in various perceptual-motor skills and visual functions are reviewed. Although a small advantage for the dominant eye in cases of unmixed manual-ocular laterality is indicated by some studies, there is reason to doubt the permanence and universality of this superiority. No advantage for either eye is found in cases of mixed laterality for any function.