Analysis of Similitude Requirements and Scaling Laws for Transonic Buffeting

Download this report (PDF, 1.15 MB, 32 pages)
Report Number: RTD-TDR 63-4197 Part I, p. 49
Author(s): Peterson, H. C., Ezra, A. A.
Corporate Author(s): The Martin Company
Laboratory: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory
Date of Publication: 1964-03
Pages: 32
DoD Task:

Abstract:
When a launch vehicle accelerates through Mach 1, a shock wave forms, remains attached to the nose for a brief time and then separates as the Mach number increases. During the period of shock wave attachment, intense local unsteady aerodynamic pressures of an oscillatory nature are generated. These unsteady pressures which give rise to the violent shaking referred to as transonic buffeting forces must be specified, for analytical purposes, as a non-dimensional plot of power spectral density versus frequency. Due to the limitations of the present theoretical knowledge, these power spectral density curves must be derived from wind-tunnel tests. In order to conduct valid scale model tests, to determine the transonic buffeting excitation, a careful analysis of similitude requirements is necessary; and it is mandatory to determine the importance of those similitude requirements that cannot be provided due to the limitations of existing wind tunnels. This paper derives the similitude requirements and the corresponding scaling laws for small scale experimental work and describes the different experimental approaches that can be used to circumvent the practical difficulties of fulfilling all the similitude requirements.

Provenance: Bombardier/Aero

Other options for obtaining this report:

Via the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC):
Via National Technical Report Library:
This report may be available for download from NTRL. Use the Title from this record to locate the item in DTIC Online

Indications of Public Availability
No digital image of an index entry indicating public availability is currently available
There has been no verification of an indication of public availability from an inside cover statement



Related report(s)

This report is part of the following conference: